This “Assessment of Achievement” comes from my daughter’s year 1 school report (Bilgola Plateau Public School; semester 2, 2010). Ever hopeful, six months on I still pull it out of the drawer for a re-read in the hope of learning something useful:-
English “Overall achievement: Achieving” Mathematics “Overall achievement: Achieving”
Helpfully, the department of education provided me with an “Assessment of Achievement” table wherein the achievement of achieving is defined in the following way:
“The student has a sound knowledge and understanding of the main areas of content and has achieved a satisfactory level of competence in the processes and skills.”
Hmmm. Slightly more confused than before. I thought her achievement was achieving but now I’m informed that “achieving”, more specifically, means she “has achieved”. How can someone be in the process of doing something they’ve already done? If I refer to the table with the other “Assessment of Achievement” definitions maybe I’ll learn whether achieving as an achievement is a good thing or a bad thing and whether any of this has anything to do my 6-year-old daughter’s ability to do english and maths? Okay, so the other achievement levels are listed as outstanding, proficient, developing, limited; does that help me? I’m soon perplexed. Every level, except proficient, “has achieved” in some way, shape or form, so am I to assume that she’s behind the other levels if they’ve already achieved their achievement while she’s still achieving hers? Or maybe it’s the opposite? Does the answer lie in the skill of having achieved her achievement whilst simultaneously achieving? Now I’m thinking she’s an over-achiever. I’m happy enough with that. At least she’s not limited or developing. Those poor parents will be catatonic from the strain of spotting the microscopic point at which the achievement of “elementary knowledge” can officially be defined as going forward into “basic knowledge.”
I can't express how good it feels to get that off my chest, finally!! Thanks for reading.
|